The Story Of Echidna. Fast Facts
. Pronunciation . Origin

The Story of Echidna Fast Facts†¨ Pronunciation: Origin: Greek Home: Phrygia, Tartarus Role: Guardian of Earth’s Treasures, Mother of All Monsters Parents: Gaia and Tartarus, or Keto and Phorkys Spouse: Typhon Children: Cerberus, Chimera, Colchian Dragon, Gorgon, Hydra, Ladon, Nemean Lion, Orthrus, Sphinx (Possibly also: Caucasian Eagle, Phaea, Scylla) Who is Echidna? Echidna is a guardian, goddess, monster, or mother of the sprits that are the alternative to the Olympians, dependent on the source. Regardless of how one views her, as the mother of many of the creatures that Heracles was tasked with killing, her importance to the Greeks is without question. Origin Echidna was the daughter of either Gaia and Tartarus, or Keto and†¦show more content†¦Most of them were overcome or killed by them. Bellerophon killed Chimera, the three-headed monster that appears to be made of leftover bits from a dragon, a goat, and a lion. Echidna’s child the Colchian Dragon was shown more mercy, and merely lulled to slumber in Jason’s effort to retrieve the Golden Fleece that it guarded. Her half-human, half-lion daughter the Sphinx killed herself, either by throwing herself from a cliff or devouring her own body, when Oedipus was able to answer her riddles. There is very little information on her daughter Gorgon, other than as some point she became three daughters and not one. Regardless, Euryale, Medusa, and Stheno all shared hideous faces and hair consisting of writhing, angry, serpents. Of the three, only Medusa was mortal, which is probably the origin of why her being a child of Echidna is sometimes questioned. It is probably also why only her death is noted, at the hands of Perseus. One Hero, Many Deaths Surely the most hated hero by Echidna would be Heracles, though. In his twelve labors he bested or killed six of her children. The victim in his first labor was the Nemean Lion, who would become the constellation Leo. His second labor brought him face to face with the Lernaean Hydra, and again, another child of Echidna was slain. In his fourth labor, on a side portion of his quest, Hercules killed the Caucasian Eagle, who may or may not

Undocumented Immigrants Face Of The U.s. Is Unemployment...

An issue that many undocumented immigrants face in the U.S. is unemployment and economical disparities. It is important to focus on the challenges Latino immigrants encounter in the workforce. Immigrants do not account for the majority of Latino workers in the United States. Since the recession the economy has not restored all the jobs that were lost. Jobs being added are hardly keeping ahead the other supply of workers. Most of the jobs recovered are being occupied by U.S. born workers. According to the article Latino Jobs Growth Driven By U.S. Born, Rakesh Kochhar states â€Å" U.S.-born Hispanics gained 2.3 million jobs in the recovery, compared with a loss of 37,000 jobs in the recession. For Hispanic immigrants, the 453,000 jobs gained in†¦show more content†¦between 1965 and 2000 that have allowed the back and forth tossing of undocumented immigrants. The U.S. implements these laws based on their economic needs and not the needs of the people. The U.S. is well known f or deporting immigrants when not needed and re-allowing them into the United States when facing an economical decline. In 1965 Congress passed The Immigration and Nationality Act that abolished national-origin quotas and set family reunification and needed skills as the main criteria for entry into the United States. Before the act was passed, under the old system admission depended on the national origins quota. However, under the new system previous criteria was eliminated and admissions was based on the abilities and skills immigrants could offer for the bettering of the United States. The unemployment rates are high in Latino immigrant communities because these laws are enforced to prohibit them from obtaining a job and immigrants terminated. Lawmakers also intended to make it more difficult for undocumented immigrants with the passage of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986. For example IRCA required employers to request documents authorizing immigrants to work in the United States. In the book Waiting On Washington: Central American Workers in the Nation s Capital, Terry Repak demonstrates IRCA being enforced especially amongst Latino immigrants. For example, INS agents raided

How Does Steinbeck Present Curly’s Wife Free Essays

Of mice and men’ is one of Nobel Prize winning author John Steinbecks most poignant. ‘ Set in the 1930s during the Great Depression it features two farm workers called George ad Lenny. The travel around together in search of work sharing a dream of a place of their own- a small ranch where they can live and work for themselves. We will write a custom essay sample on How Does Steinbeck Present Curly’s Wife or any similar topic only for you Order Now It tells the story of how violence may erupt to destroy those dreams. Curley’s wife- as she is known to the audience- is the only women on the ranch. Without the identity of a name she is known only by association of the man she doesn’t even like. Despite her marriage to Curley she flaunts herself around the ranch in inappropriate clothing ‘she had full rouged lips†¦She wore a cotton housedress and red mules,’ flirting with ranch hands and is conscious of the effect she has on men. These clothes and her behaviour I think are designed to provoke interest and attention rather than to invite intimacy. She seems preoccupied with strategies to avoid detection from her husband and manages this by continuously asking of his whereabouts. ‘Have any of you boys seen Curley? ’ Like George, Lenny and later on Candy, Curley’s wife has a dream despite it being one of great contrast to theirs. She has an ambition to work in films ‘coulda been in the movies and worn nice clothes’ and this is no doubt stemmed from her desire for attention and is linked to her loneliness and insecurities on the ranch as she bitterly resents not being treated as an individual. Men make promises to her ‘he says he was gonna out me in the movies’ but she appears to lack the intelligence to realise the emptiness of their promises. The perceptions we make of Curley’s wife are corrupted from the views of the ranch hands. Because sexuality is her only weapon she is referred to as ‘jailbait’ and ‘ a tart’ ‘Jesus what a tramp. George has reason to be weary of her presence especially with Lenny around and the incident in Weed. ‘Listen to me you crazy bastard†¦ Don’t you even look at that bitch Curley’s wife is first presented to us on page 32 ‘ the rectangle of sunshine in the doorway was cut off’ a girl was standing there looking in’ Curley’s wife has brought darkness supposedly symbolising the potential danger of her character. During the last chapter Steinbeck cleverly attempts to alter our perception of Curley’s wife by portraying her in a different light. During chapter five, Lenny has just killed one of Slim’s puppies by clumsily petting it. His tendency to inflict damage through trying to show affection is become more prominent. Steinbeck creates an atmosphere of tragedy and doom in which the reader is aware of Lenny’s anxiety ‘and rattled the halter chains. ’ Curley’s wife enters wearing ‘a bright cotton dress’ and ‘red ostrich feathers’ and the reader already knows of Lennies attraction the colour red which creates a sense of painful inevitability. Her face is ‘made up’ and her ‘curls’ are in place†¦ This suggested to me that she has obviously made herself as seductive as possible. Curley’s wife is attracted to Lenny because he has got the better of her husband. I think she has worked out an arrangement to ensure that Lenny and her will be alone without interruption but Lenny is acutely aware of George’s instructions to avoid conversation with her aswell as the consequences of not being able to ‘tend he rabbits. ’ She is desperate to talk to him ‘you’re a nice guy, why can’t I talk to you? ’ and when getting the chance to do so the words pour out of her in her passion for communication although Lenny barely listens. Here she describes her desire to be an actress, her naivete in thinking her ‘old lady’ had stolen the letter and why she married Curley and not liking him. Yet it is as this point that despite her provocative dress sense and her sensuality we realise that she wants only to talk to Lenny ‘why can’t I talk to you? I never talk to nobody. I get awful lonely’ and comfort him when he tells her how he has killed the puppy, ‘don’t you worry none. ’ Steinbeck has cleverly created a more passionate portrayal, someone we can feel sympathy for. At the point where Curley’s wife offers for Lenny to stroke her hair ‘feel right round there, feel how soft it is’ the audience are uncertain as to whether this is an innocent, childish act referring to its texture or that she is knowingly leading Lenny towards a sexual encounter. It is also apparent at this period, of how young she actually is, the act of stroking hair is very harmless and childlike, not what we would expect of her character earlier in the novel. She is likened to a little girl who wants to feel physical contact without sexual trace. When Lenny is petting Curley’s wife’s hair he proceeds in ‘mussing it up’ I noticed how she only struggled when she came to this realisation again pointing to her self-image and vanity. Lenny mistakenly breaks Curley’s wife’s neck and is fatally killed. Lenny escapes and we are left with a desciption of the setting of the barn and of her, ‘and the meanness and the planning’s and the discontent and the ache for attention were all gone from her face’ here Steinbeck sums up everything we already know about her but in a way that transforms the way we think about her. Still with flawless skin she appears ‘pretty and simple†¦sweet and young’ a complete contrast to what is perceived of her in earlier chapters. I think her death could have just as well of been caused by Lenny’s unthinking roughness as by any decisions of hers that things had gone to far. A ‘shepherd bitch’ symbolises an entity that Curley’s wife will never possess, this being children ‘jumped in among the puppies. ’ Curley’s wife is undoubtedly one of the most poignant characters in the novel and one that Steinbeck portrays his feeling for than any other character. How to cite How Does Steinbeck Present Curly’s Wife, Essay examples

Cloning Has Science Gone Too Far Essay free essay sample

, Research Paper Cloning: HAS SCIENCE GONE TOO FAR? Introduction For old ages the topic of cloning has captured the imaginativenesss of writers, film managers and much of the human population. Cloning is the chance of making an animate being or even a individual that is genetically indistinguishable to its # 8220 ; parent. # 8221 ; Until late the topic seemed implausible and fictional, because no 1 truly realized how close we had really advanced in cloning research. It was during February of 1997 that an embryologist, Dr. Ian Wilmut, announced the birth of a cloned lamb named Dolly. She was the first of all time successfully cloned mammal from an grownup cell. What Dr. Wilmut did was astonishing. He took the Deoxyribonucleic acid from a six-year-old Ewe and fused it with the egg of another Ewe after taking the 2nd Ewe # 8217 ; s ain DNA. After blending, the cell began to split every bit would a regular embryo. The embryo was so implanted in a 3rd Ewe who merely a few months subsequently gave birth to Dolly 1. Upon intelligence of this, many people began to oppugn the possibility of non merely making genetically indistinguishable sheep, but worlds every bit good. There has been much contention on whether or non the cloning of worlds every bit good as animate beings is ethical or even moral. Besides there has been much treatment as to whether or non the benefits of cloning outweigh the dangers. WHAT ARE THE BENEFITS IN CLONING RESEARCH? There is no uncertainty that Dr. Wilmut # 8217 ; s new finds have brought an tumult of exhilaration between non merely the scientific community, but the general populace every bit good. Groups such as husbandmans, sawboness and even conservationists have shown assorted involvements in cloning research. The agriculture community has expressed much machination in cloning for the intent of being able to reproduce transcripts of their best animate beings. For illustration, a dairy husbandman would much instead be able to take his best dairy cow and animate it by copying its Deoxyribonucleic acid as opposed to engendering it and taking a opportunity that the calf would either be male or an unprofitable female2. Medical physicians have besides been rather interested in the recent finds of Dr. Wilmut every bit good. Cloning research has brought them one measure closer to the possibility of really cloning variety meats. The advantages of this would be the ability to take person # 8217 ; s DNA and utilize it to make a healthy and compatible organ to replace one that is failing3. A good illustration of this would be a bosom graft patient. Scientists would be able to make a bosom within a research lab scene and engraft it into the patient. Environmentalists have besides jumped on the cloning # 8220 ; bandwagon. # 8221 ; There has been treatment of utilizing cloning techniques in engendering endangered species which have problem reproducing in imprisonment. Panda bears would be a good illustration of this. WHAT ARE THE DANGERS IN CLONING? There have been several expostulations that are related to the dangers in cloning animate beings every bit good as the possibility of cloning worlds. There have been many scientists who do non believe that this research should be continued due to the dangers that it presents. There were complications in the birth of Dolly. She was the lone successful birth out of 277 attempts within 29 different ewes4. All 276 of the staying embryos died before they were born. As Dr. Colin Stewart, a celebrated embryolgist at the National Cancer Institute, was quoted as stating # 8220 ; # 8230 ; the high rate of self-generated abortion suggests, cloning sometimes amendss DNA. As a consequence Dolly could develop a figure of diseases that could shorten her life5. # 8221 ; During a United States hearing refering authorities support for cloning research, Representative Vernon Ehlers of Michigan pointed out one danger in human cloning. # 8221 ; # 8216 ; What if in the cloning procedure you produce person with two caputs and three arms. # 8217 ; he said. # 8216 ; Are you merely traveling to euthanize and dispose of that individual? The reply is no. We # 8217 ; re speaking about human life6. # 8217 ; # 8221 ; Another factor to take into consideration is the psychological reverberations that a individual may confront if they were to be born as a clo ne. There may be certain force per unit areas for them to be or move a certain manner. Possibly society might anticipate excessively much or even excessively small out of them because of whom from which they were cloned. Their full individualism could acquire lost in the whole procedure every bit good, due to the mere fact that they are indistinguishable to the parent. Aside from the dangers in cloning people, there are besides dangers related to cloning farm animate beings every bit good. # 8220 ; Cloned animate beings, FitzGerald said, might sound appealing-scientists could clone the pantry Kobe beef cowss or the meatiest hogs, for illustration. But these cloned animals would besides portion an indistinguishable susceptibleness to disease, he cautioned. An full cloned herd could be wiped out nightlong if the virus swept through it7. # 8221 ; While it may look more profitable to husbandmans to clone their animate beings, it really could stop up bing them more in the long tally. Decision Make THE BENEFITS OUTWEIGH THE DANGERS? There is no uncertainty that the scientific discipline of cloning has brought mankind further in front than anyone of all time thought possible. But is it worth the hazards? The reply is no. Every benefit that cloning nowadayss can be easy counterned by an even greater danger. Take the possibility of salvaging endangered species. If, for case, we were able to salvage the full Panda bear population by agencies of cloning, we would still be unable to supply them with the natural home ground that they need. Let us non bury that it is the decreasing environment from which they come that is to fault for their extinction. And while it would be great to salvage the Panda bear population, we should concentrate our attempts more towards the existent ground for their extinction. As stated earlier, there are many possible familial lacks that can ensue from cloning. Now, taking into consideration that factor, would there truly be much demand for consumers to purchase merchandises that come from perchance genetically deffective animate beings? Of class non. If anything people would more likely stick to meat or dairy merchandises that were produced in a natural environment. Undoutedly, the most good consequence that cloning can show is the ability to make variety meats. But, we must recognize the hazard involved every bit good. There would most likely be a great many failures before there were to be even one success. And there is no significant grounds that this would even be possible. So the hazard seems to greatly outweigh any possible benefit. The hazards involved in cloning people every bit good as animate beings are of a much greater magnitude than many people realize. Our society needs to get down weighing in the unsafe effects before doing any solid decisions, because cloning may weave up bing us much more than we bargained for. Notes 1. Gina Kolata, # 8220 ; Scientist Reports First Cloning Ever of Adult Mammal, # 8221 ; New York Times Online, February 23, 1997, 1 ( www.nytimes.com ) 2. J. Madeline Nash, # 8220 ; The Age of Cloning, # 8221 ; Time Magazine, March 10, 1997, Vol. 149, No.10, 1 ( www.time.com ) 3. Kolata, # 8220 ; Scientist Reports First Cloning Ever of Adult Mammal, # 8221 ; 3 4. Nash, # 8220 ; The Age of Cloning, # 8221 ; Vol. 149, No.10, 3 5. Nash, # 8220 ; The Age of Cloning, # 8221 ; Vol. 149, No.10, 3 6. Katharine Q. Seelye, # 8220 ; Congressman Offers Bill to Ban Cloning of Humans, # 8221 ; New York Times Online, March 6, 1997, 1 7. Kolata, # 8220 ; With Cloning of a Sheep, Ethical Ground Shifts, # 8221 ; New York Times Online, February 24, 1997, 3 Kass, Leon R. and James Q. Wilson. The Ethics of Human Cloning Washington, D.C. : The AE Press, 1998 Kolata, Gina. # 8220 ; Scientist Reports First Cloning Ever of Adult Mammal. # 8221 ; New York Times Online ( www.nytimes.com ) , 23 February 1997 Kolata, Gina. # 8220 ; With Cloning Sheep, Ethical Ground Shifts. # 8221 ; New York Times Online ( www.nytimes.com ) , 24 February 1997 Nash, J. Madeline. # 8221 ; The Age of Cloning. # 8221 ; Time Magazine ( www.time.com ) , 10 March 1997 Sleeye, Katharine. # 8220 ; Congressman Offers Bill to Ban Cloning of Humans. # 8221 ; New York Times Online ( www.nytimes.com ) 6 March 1997